Optical networks are being deployed at a rate never seen before, bringing more bandwidth and capabilities to network operators. The pace, proliferation, and complexity presents new challenges. Network Operations Centers (NOCs) are being tasked with more responsibilities, layering in skills for optical, routing, switching, application, and security related support tasks. Therefore it makes sense that Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being explored and implemented across optical networks and NOCs to enhance efficiency by automating tasks, predicting failures, and improving monitoring, management, and overall network performance. This makes AI operations increasingly vital in the modern NOC, helping staff respond rapidly and effectively on real issues. Despite the potential, there are some significant limitations to consider.
Limitations of AI in Optical Networks
AI has made strides in optimizing optical network performance, but its limitations in real-time and nuanced orchestration highlight the ongoing need for human expertise in high-capacity fiber environments. Here are a few aspects to consider.
- Trustworthiness and explainability: AI decision-making processes can be opaque, making it difficult for network operators to understand why certain decisions are made. This lack of transparency can hinder trust and adoption, especially in critical network functions. Operators might worry about the system providing incorrect information without a clear rationale.
- Integration with legacy systems: Optical networks often comprise a mix of old and new hardware and software. Integrating AI-based automation with these diverse and legacy technologies can be complicated, requiring significant investment and specialized expertise. Ensuring seamless interoperability and data exchange can be a major hurdle.
- Availability of expertise: Planning, deploying, and managing AI-driven network automation demands specialized skills in both networking and AI and Machine Learning. Organizations typically face a shortage of professionals with this combined expertise, leading to challenges in implementation and maintenance.
- Over-reliance and the need for human oversight: While AI can automate many tasks, human expertise remains crucial for handling complex, unforeseen issues and ensuring network continuity and reliability. Over-dependence on AI without maintaining sufficient human oversight can be risky, especially during critical failures. Clear escalation paths are essential when AI reaches its limits.
- Data security concerns: Network operators are (thankfully) highly sensitive to data security. Ensuring the AI systems are secure to prevent breaches is a significant concern that needs careful consideration during implementation.
- Limited consolidated multi-vendor NMS systems: Finding AI tools that are multi-OEM compatible with high degrees of both monitoring and accurate pre-configured AI intelligence is challenging. This creates tool sprawl and layering of tools. Additionally, these tools find challenges combining optical layers of the network with additional layers of the IT environment. Where a vendor may have a NMS or AI system that sprawls more than one vendor platform, often the platforms that are not their core product are minimally supported creating additional load by IT staff for configuration and training of the platform.
- Complexity of network environments: Modern optical networks are becoming increasingly dynamic and complex, with multi-vendor equipment and evolving technologies. AI models need to be robust enough to handle this complexity and adapt to changes effectively. Training AI models on such diverse and evolving environments can be challenging.
- Handling uncertainty and non-deterministic events: Optical networks are subject to unpredictable events and incomplete information. AI agents need to be capable of operating effectively under such uncertainty, which requires sophisticated probabilistic models and robust decision-making capabilities.
- Cost of implementation and maintenance: Implementing AI solutions can involve significant upfront costs for software, hardware, and specialized personnel. Ongoing maintenance, model retraining, and updates also contribute to the total cost of ownership. Organizations need to carefully evaluate the return on investment.
Limitations of AI in NOC Monitoring and Management Tools
While AI-driven tools have transformed Network Operations Center (NOC) monitoring and management, they still face a number of constraints that require additional expertise:
- Data quality and inconsistency: AI’s effectiveness relies heavily on the quality and consistency of the data it learns from. NOCs often deal with data from various monitoring tools with different formats and levels of detail. Inconsistent or incomplete data can lead to inaccurate AI predictions and actions.
- Alert fatigue: While AI can help filter and correlate alerts, poorly implemented AI can also generate excessive or irrelevant alerts, contributing to alert fatigue among NOC personnel. The AI needs to be finely tuned to provide actionable and meaningful insights.
- Siloed visibility: If the underlying monitoring tools provide a fragmented view of the network, the AI will also be limited in its ability to provide a holistic understanding and identify cross-domain issues. Integrated and comprehensive data sources are crucial for effective AI in NOCs.
- Handling novel and unseen anomalies: AI models are typically trained on historical data. They might struggle to detect and respond effectively to completely new types of failures or security threats that have no precedent in the training data. Continuous learning and adaptation are essential.
- Balancing automation and human expertise: Completely autonomous NOC operations are still a distant goal. Finding the right balance between automating routine tasks and preserving human judgment for complex situations is critical. AI should augment human capabilities, not replace them entirely.
- Scalability challenges: As network infrastructure grows and becomes more complex, AI systems need to scale accordingly to handle the increasing volume and velocity of data. Ensuring the AI solutions can keep pace with this growth can be a challenge.
- Integration with existing NOC workflows and processes: Implementing AI tools requires careful integration with existing NOC workflows, processes, and personnel. Resistance to change and the need for retraining can be significant hurdles.
In conclusion, while AI offers tremendous potential for enhancing optical networks and NOC operations, it’s essential to acknowledge and address these limitations to ensure successful and effective implementation. A balanced approach that combines the power of AI with human expertise and careful consideration of the specific network environment is key to realizing the full benefits of AI in these domains.
At Kore-Tek, we have implemented and are able to rapidly train our AI Operations (AIOps) platform to be able to understand your network environment, accurately identify issues, and help direct our NOC to be able to rapidly react when events occur. Contact us to find out how Kore-Tek can help:
For more on NOC services, check out these blogs.